Anubis wrote: If we start showing off (as it were) more than one group at a time I see the message the Spotlight section is sending out changing from the promotion of a new group to "We're bigger, more active, and more popular groups than the rest". In essence, those groups standing out whereas others do not.
BlackDove wrote:Good, because that's how it is.
The moment we start lying to eachother is the moment we go down.
If anything, those in less populated groups (like myself) should be happy with people in the spotlight position, and that they're succeeding so well.
We're all SSX here, there are no divisions and no restrictions.
I think KJ made a good call.
I want new groups to have a chance and get the top spot for growth, but not at the expense of our core, solid groups.
BlackDove wrote:Don't share the opinion myself.
By putting groups in the spotlight we show that they're prime for growth. That's all that it does, and should mean. Anyone interperting it in the wrong way, has to have pretty bad perception, because we said what the spotlight is for.
BlackDove wrote:As far as equality goes, I agree to equality as members, but I am really not eager to hold back a group from shining nicely if it can, just because my own group isn't in the same position.
Inquisitor wrote:Anny, I don't understand the objection.
IRC, when you get a chance, you are not being clear.
This is an exception, and in my opinion a good one. It only sends that message if you are seding that message, so, lets talk this out before you blow a basket
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests